Home   |   Sci News   |   Discussion Forum   |   Books, Books, Books   |   Curiosity Shop
Discussion Forum
Science Talk
Discuss scientific conundrums with our band of bamboozled boffins.
Search
Custom Search
Sponsored Links
Science Shopping
Sci Shop
Peculiar and bizarre scientific stuff that you didn't even know existed and you don't need.
News And Research

Animal Kingdom

Biology

Climate Change

Environment

Evolution

Genetics

Humans

Mind & Brain

Prehistory

Health & Diet

Health Threats

Health & Environment

Health: From The Lab

Mental Health

Reproductive Health

Energy Alternatives

Chemistry

Computing & Electronics

Nanotechnology

Pimping Nature

Robotics & AI

Physics

Space


Science Books
Book Reviews
Rusty Rockets lists his all-time favorite science titles.
Archives
2009 2008 2007
2006 2005 2004
2003 2002 2001
2000 1999 1998
Discussion Archive
Feature Archive


15 October 2008
Plentiful poo traces confirm Brits' aversion to handwashing
by Kate Melville

A new study by researchers from the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine has found that the further north in England you go, the more likely you are to find fecal bacteria on people's hands, especially men. But women living in the south have little to feel smug about. In London, they were found to be three times as likely as their menfolk to have dirty hands. The men of London registered the most impressive score among all those surveyed, with a mere 6 percent found to have fecal bugs on their hands.

The Dirty Hands Study was conducted in order to provide a snapshot of the UK's hand hygiene habits, as part of the world's first Global Handwashing Day today (October 15th). The results were compiled by swabbing commuters' hands at bus stops outside five train stations around the UK (Newcastle, Liverpool, Birmingham, London (Euston) and Cardiff).

The results indicated that commuters in Newcastle were up to three times more likely than those in London to have fecal bacteria on their hands (44 percent compared to 13 percent) while those in Birmingham and Cardiff were roughly equal in the hand hygiene stakes (23 percent and 24 percent respectively). Commuters in Liverpool also registered a high score for fecal bacteria, with a contamination rate of 34 percent.

In Newcastle and Liverpool, men were more likely than women to show contamination (53 percent of men compared to 30 percent of women in Newcastle, and 36 percent of men compared to 31 percent of women in Liverpool), although in the other three centers, the women's hands were dirtier. In Euston, they were more than three times likelier than the men to have fecal bacteria on their hands (the men here registered an impressive 6 percent, compared to a rate of 21 percent in the women).

"We were flabbergasted by the finding that so many people had fecal bugs on their hands. The figures were far higher than we had anticipated, and suggest that there is a real problem with people washing their hands in the UK. If any of these people had been suffering from a diarrhea disease, the potential for it to be passed around would be greatly increased by their failure to wash their hands after going to the toilet," warned Dr Val Curtis, Director of the Hygiene Centre at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine.

Related:
Did Poo Problems Plague Dead Sea Scroll Sect?
Rodent Comparison Supports Hygiene Hypothesis

Source: London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine


Home         All The News      Science Forum         Books, Books, Books         Curiosity Shop         About

The terms and conditions governing your use of this website.
Copyright © 1997 - 2009 Science a Go Go and its licensors. All rights reserved.