Home   |   Sci News   |   Discussion Forum   |   Books, Books, Books   |   Curiosity Shop
Discussion Forum
Science Talk
Discuss scientific conundrums with our band of bamboozled boffins.
Search
Custom Search
Sponsored Links
Science Shopping
Sci Shop
Peculiar and bizarre scientific stuff that you didn't even know existed and you don't need.
News And Research

Animal Kingdom

Biology

Climate Change

Environment

Evolution

Genetics

Humans

Mind & Brain

Prehistory

Health & Diet

Health Threats

Health & Environment

Health: From The Lab

Mental Health

Reproductive Health

Energy Alternatives

Chemistry

Computing & Electronics

Nanotechnology

Pimping Nature

Robotics & AI

Physics

Space


Science Books
Book Reviews
Rusty Rockets lists his all-time favorite science titles.
Archives
2009 2008 2007
2006 2005 2004
2003 2002 2001
2000 1999 1998
Discussion Archive
Feature Archive


3 January 2007
Menstrual Suppression OK, Say Doctors
by Kate Melville

Forty years ago, when birth control pills first hit the market, the recommended cycle was three weeks of active contraceptive pills followed by one week of placebos or no pills. But now, many gynecologists believe that the week without contraception - during which a woman experiences a "withdrawal bleed" that mimics the normal menstrual cycle - isn't necessary.

While there are still widespread concerns about the side-effects from hormonal birth control, many women are suppressing menstruation using new formulation pills that result in four periods a year, while others take normal birth control pills without the week of placebos or no pills.

Susan Ernst, chief of gynecology services for the University Health Service at the University of Michigan, suggests that suppressing the menstrual cycle completely is not very different from using the three-weeks-on, one-week-off cycle. "When a woman chooses to use hormonal contraceptives, she's giving her body estrogen and progesterone, and that suppresses her own hormonal fluctuations," Ernst says. "So she's already controlling her cycle by taking those hormonal contraceptives and can further control her cycle by eliminating the pill-free interval or placebo pills."

A recent survey by the Association of Reproductive Health Professionals found that 71 percent of women surveyed do not enjoy getting their period each month. But critics contend that too much remains unknown about the effects of menstrual suppression. Some say it prevents women from ridding their bodies of excess iron; that it is unnatural to suppress one's cycle; and that more needs to be known about the effects on women's bone health, heart health and cancer risks.

But Ernst says that the practice of physicians prescribing contraceptives to stop women's menstrual cycles is not new. "Gynecologists have been doing this for years," she says, "using hormonal contraception for treating women with painful, heavy or irregular periods, or painful premenstrual symptoms." Menstrual suppression has also been used among women with endometriosis, a painful condition in which tissue that normally lines the inside of the uterus grows outside of the uterus.

Ernst cautioned that there are risks related to hormonal contraception, including blood clots, hypertension, stroke and heart attack, especially among women who smoke. "A woman has to take those risks into account when thinking about using hormonal contraception for menstrual suppression," Ernst said. "Women should discuss the risks and benefits with their doctors before deciding to suppress their menstrual cycles."

Source: University of Michigan Health System


Home         All The News      Science Forum         Books, Books, Books         Curiosity Shop         About

The terms and conditions governing your use of this website.
Copyright © 1997 - 2009 Science a Go Go and its licensors. All rights reserved.