Home   |   Sci News   |   Discussion Forum   |   Books, Books, Books   |   Curiosity Shop
Discussion Forums
General Science

Not-Quite Science

Physics

Climate Change

Science Fiction

Past Forums

Search
Custom Search
Sponsored Links
News And Research

Animal Kingdom

Biology

Climate Change

Environment

Evolution

Genetics

Humans

Mind & Brain

Prehistory

Health & Diet

Health Threats

Health & Environment

Health: From The Lab

Mental Health

Reproductive Health

Energy Alternatives

Chemistry

Computing & Electronics

Nanotechnology

Pimping Nature

Robotics & AI

Physics

Space


Science Shopping
Sci Shop
Peculiar and bizarre scientific stuff that you didn't even know existed and you don't need.
Science Books
Book Reviews
Rusty Rockets lists his all-time favorite science titles.
Archives
2010
2009 2008 2007
2006 2005 2004
2003 2002 2001
2000 1999 1998
Feature Archive

Bookmark and Share


3 August 2006
Obesity’s Double-Whammy Effect On Healthcare System
by Kate Melville

Obesity isn't just a health hazard; it may also hinder the provision of healthcare. Writing in the journal Radiology, radiologist Dr. Raul N. Uppot said that increasing obesity in the U.S. has doubled the number of inconclusive diagnostic imaging exams over the last 15 years.

Uppot came up with his findings after analyzing Massachusetts General Hospital radiology records over a 15-year period. Primarily, this involved a search for incomplete exams that carried the label "limited by body habitus," meaning limited in quality due to patient size.

"While 0.10 percent of inconclusive exams were due to patient size in 1989, by 2003 the number had jumped to 0.19 percent, despite advances in imaging technology," said Uppot. "Americans need to know that obesity can hinder their medical care when they enter a hospital." And it isn't just radiology being affected. Hospitals are feeling the strain from requiring larger wheelchairs and beds. And standard operating tables and imaging equipment are not suitable for obese patients.

Uppot said that most of the difficulties encountered in rendering a diagnosis were apparent in abdominal ultrasound, followed by chest x-rays, abdominal computed tomography (CT), abdominal x-rays, chest CT and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). CT and MRI can be problematic because of weight limitations of the imaging table and the size of the opening on the imager (patients are inserted through a small "hole in the doughnut"). Standard CT tables can accommodate patients weighing up to 450 pounds, and MRI machines can typically obtain diagnostic-quality images in patients weighing up to 350 pounds.

More flesh also makes it harder for the machines to gather acceptable images. While x-ray and CT power output can be increased, this leads to an undesirable increase in radiation dose. Ramping up the power levels also increases stress on the imaging systems, due to increased power output and more rapid burnout (as in the case of x-ray tubes). "In the short term, the medical community must accommodate these patients by investing in technology to help them," Uppot lamented. "[But] in the long term, this country must make cultural shifts that promote more exercise and a healthier diet."

Source: Radiological Society of North America


Discuss this article in our forum

Home         All The News      Science Forum         Books, Books, Books         Curiosity Shop         About

The terms and conditions governing your use of this website.
Copyright © 1997 - 2010 Science a Go Go and its licensors. All rights reserved.