Home   |   Sci News   |   Discussion Forum   |   Books, Books, Books   |   Curiosity Shop
Discussion Forums
General Science

Not-Quite Science

Physics

Climate Change

Science Fiction

Past Forums

Search
Custom Search
Sponsored Links
News And Research

Animal Kingdom

Biology

Climate Change

Environment

Evolution

Genetics

Humans

Mind & Brain

Prehistory

Health & Diet

Health Threats

Health & Environment

Health: From The Lab

Mental Health

Reproductive Health

Energy Alternatives

Chemistry

Computing & Electronics

Nanotechnology

Pimping Nature

Robotics & AI

Physics

Space


Science Shopping
Sci Shop
Peculiar and bizarre scientific stuff that you didn't even know existed and you don't need.
Science Books
Book Reviews
Rusty Rockets lists his all-time favorite science titles.
Archives
2010
2009 2008 2007
2006 2005 2004
2003 2002 2001
2000 1999 1998
Feature Archive

Bookmark and Share


15 December 1998
Worms And Parsnips Support Concept Of Co-Evolution

The idea of co-evolution is not new, but it is far from universally accepted. In 1964, Paul R. Ehrlich, now president of Stanford University's Center for Conservation Biology, and Peter H. Raven, now director of the Missouri Botanical Garden and botany professor at Washington University in St. Louis, founded the study of co-evolution. They defined it as the process of reciprocal evolutionary change in interacting species.

They noted that plants produce chemicals that are toxic to insects, and that insects produce mechanisms to detoxify many plant defenses. However, while most scientists accept the notion that insects must adapt to their host plants, some have debated whether plants tailor their toxins specifically against insects.

With the help of museum specimens of parsnip plants, including some that predate the webworms' post-1900 entry into the Midwest, University of Illinois entomologists May R. Berenbaum and Arthur R. Zangerl say they have strong evidence for both sides of the adaptation scenario. Their findings were published in the Nov. 10 issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Today's webworms and parsnips in Minnesota and in northern and central Illinois have adapted to each other, the scientists report. Webworms feed on the reproductive structures of parsnips, so resistance to the insect is vital to parsnip survival. At each site, levels in the plants of four defensive compounds, called furanocoumarins, match remarkably to the levels of detoxification enzymes in the insects.

"If 30 per cent of the plants have a particular chemical phenotype, then roughly 30 per cent of the insects have the phenotype that permits them to live on those plants," Zangerl said. "You see quite a balancing act. This occurred to a remarkable degree in three of the four populations that we observed."

To strengthen their case, the researchers examined pre-1900 museum specimens kept by the U. of I. Herbarium. They found that the furanocoumarin compound sphondin - produced in high levels in today's parsnips - was produced in low quantities or not at all in the museum specimens. It is sphondin, they found, that the webworms have a hard time metabolizing.

"They have no genetic variation to be able to metabolize it," Berenbaum said. "People have a hard time accepting the idea that plant traits represent a response to insect-caused damage. They assume that insects are minor annoyances to plants, like fleas on a dog, rather than major selective forces. We feel our data say that the evolutionary responses are reciprocal between these interacting species. This work also indicates how quickly plants can respond genetically to insect-caused damage."

Comment On This Story?


BACK

Home         All The News      Science Forum         Books, Books, Books         Curiosity Shop         About

The terms and conditions governing your use of this website.
Copyright © 1997 - 2010 Science a Go Go and its licensors. All rights reserved.