Johnny Boy wrote:
" think you are missing the point here. One should expect that reviewers should be aware of the scientific approach; i.e. every theory and model should at all times be examined for their validity, applicability and scientific consistency. Thus if a reviewer writes that "we do not need another model for low temperature superconduction", he/she cannot be a scientist. This is the attituide that one expects from a zealot"

Now juxtapose this with J. Arthur Gold's comment:

"You are complaining because your theory paper has been turned down by one referee? One? Geez--submit it somewhere else."

Scientists are human. Referees are human. What's the issue? Do you want to be published or pontificate about the injustices done to you personally?

DA Morgan